The James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal
  • Donate
  • Publications
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Contact
  • Academics
  • Athletics
  • Costs
  • Governance
  • Innovation
  • Politicization

Who Is Responsible for the Loss of Faith in Science?

Dec 11, 2020 · Sumantra Maitra · Comments Off on Who Is Responsible for the Loss of Faith in Science?

In an essay in the liberal UK broadsheet The Guardian, multiple authors chart out the most important task for the incoming Biden administration: to “restore the faith in science.” “Joe … Continue reading “Who Is Responsible for the Loss of Faith in Science?”


Misusing Editorial Power to Censor Unpopular Research

Jul 22, 2020 · Russell Warne · Comments Off on Misusing Editorial Power to Censor Unpopular Research

Academic freedom is under assault by people who want to control research and speech. One of their strategies exploits the gatekeeping functions of journal editors to censor unpopular ideas. The … Continue reading “Misusing Editorial Power to Censor Unpopular Research”


Why Do American Universities Lead the World in Scientific Research?

Jun 24, 2020 · John Staddon · Comments Off on Why Do American Universities Lead the World in Scientific Research?

Miguel Urquiola is professor and chair of the department of economics at Columbia University. His special field is education and his book Markets, Minds, and Money: Why America Leads the … Continue reading “Why Do American Universities Lead the World in Scientific Research?”


What Scientific Decline?

May 8, 2020 · Richard Weinberg · Comments Off on What Scientific Decline?

As a neurobiologist working at a local university for more than 30 years, I read Edward Archer’s provocative critique of scientific research with interest. We agree about a number of … Continue reading “What Scientific Decline?”


Look Beyond Citation Counts to Kickstart Scientific Innovation

Apr 22, 2020 · Anthony Hennen · Comments Off on Look Beyond Citation Counts to Kickstart Scientific Innovation

In scientific research, new ideas have become harder to find. Innovation has fallen compared to 50 years ago. Rather than a fear of “too much change,” many researchers worry about … Continue reading “Look Beyond Citation Counts to Kickstart Scientific Innovation”


University Researchers Search for Solutions to Coronavirus Pandemic

Apr 10, 2020 · Jenna A. Robinson · Comments Off on University Researchers Search for Solutions to Coronavirus Pandemic

Here at the Martin Center, we often criticize university research. Rightly so. We have noted that academic journals are too expensive. We’ve argued that the publishing process itself is incoherent … Continue reading “University Researchers Search for Solutions to Coronavirus Pandemic”


The Mess That Is Science Publishing

Jan 24, 2020 · John Staddon · Comments Off on The Mess That Is Science Publishing

Researchers have been grumbling about the state of scientific publishing for years. Now, rumor has it that the Trump administration (yes, those science-haters!) may be trying to fix at least … Continue reading “The Mess That Is Science Publishing”


The Tangled Web of Scientific Publishing

Oct 10, 2018 · John Staddon · Comments Off on The Tangled Web of Scientific Publishing

Science Publishing Is Incoherent, Expensive, and Slow Communication is essential to science. The aim of scientific publication is to convey new findings as quickly as possible to as many interested … Continue reading “The Tangled Web of Scientific Publishing”


Peer Review: the Publication Game and “the Natural Selection of Bad Science”

Feb 2, 2018 · John Staddon · Comments Off on Peer Review: the Publication Game and “the Natural Selection of Bad Science”

Editor’s Note: This is part II; part I can be found here. Professor Brian Wansink is head of the Food and Brand Lab at Cornell University. The lab has had … Continue reading “Peer Review: the Publication Game and “the Natural Selection of Bad Science””


How Is Science Judged? How Useful Is Peer Review?

Jan 31, 2018 · John Staddon · Comments Off on How Is Science Judged? How Useful Is Peer Review?

The British journal Nature, home in 1953 to Watson and Crick’s important DNA paper, was by 1966 rather in the doldrums, with a backlog of submitted manuscripts and losing ground … Continue reading “How Is Science Judged? How Useful Is Peer Review?”

Posts navigation

1 2 Next

More in Academics

  • Let Colleges Choose an Accreditor Feb 3, 2023

    Federal financial aid depends on whether your college is accredited. That means an independent agency vouches for your college, assuring that it’s not a scam and that it fulfills its … Continue reading “Let Colleges Choose an Accreditor”

  • A New Anti-DEI Petition for UNC Medical School Feb 2, 2023

    The Martin Center has often reported on the damage being done in colleges and universities under the guise of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI). Now, another organization, Color Us United … Continue reading “A New Anti-DEI Petition for UNC Medical School”

  • Social-Justice Restrictions on Research Harm All of Us Feb 1, 2023

    Recently, one of the departments on my campus invited an academic “expert,” who, among other specializations, “advise[s] on the ethical aspects of telescope siting,” to give a talk entitled “How … Continue reading “Social-Justice Restrictions on Research Harm All of Us”

More in Politicization

  • App State’s Magical Vanishing DEI Committee Feb 6, 2023

    Last May, Inside Higher Ed reported that Appalachian State University was building a summer ’22 “working group” to address how the institution solicits and evaluates “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” (DEI) … Continue reading “App State’s Magical Vanishing DEI Committee”

  • A New Anti-DEI Petition for UNC Medical School Feb 2, 2023

    The Martin Center has often reported on the damage being done in colleges and universities under the guise of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI). Now, another organization, Color Us United … Continue reading “A New Anti-DEI Petition for UNC Medical School”

  • Social-Justice Restrictions on Research Harm All of Us Feb 1, 2023

    Recently, one of the departments on my campus invited an academic “expert,” who, among other specializations, “advise[s] on the ethical aspects of telescope siting,” to give a talk entitled “How … Continue reading “Social-Justice Restrictions on Research Harm All of Us”

Popular Articles

  • App State’s Magical Vanishing DEI Committee Feb 6, 2023
    Last May, Inside Higher Ed reported that Appalachian St...
  • Jill Biden and the Doctoring of Doctoral Degrees for Nondoctors Feb 17, 2021
    “I’m hoping Dr. Jill becomes the surgeon general, his w...
  • Social-Justice Restrictions on Research Harm All of Us Feb 1, 2023
    Recently, one of the departments on my campus invited a...

Recent Articles

  • App State’s Magical Vanishing DEI Committee Feb 6, 2023

    Last May, Inside Higher Ed reported that Appalachian State University was building a summer ’22 “working group” to address how the institution solicits and evaluates “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” (DEI) … Continue reading “App State’s Magical Vanishing DEI Committee”

  • Why do we need law schools? Feb 5, 2023

    To the editor: In the article ‘A Better Way to Teach Law’, Mr. Andersson makes a good case for the value of getting people into the workforce sooner, I also … Continue reading “Why do we need law schools?”

  • Lowery “outplayed” by UT-Austin administrators Feb 5, 2023

    To the editor: Lots of talk, then… Richard Lowery is an associate professor of finance at the University of Texas at Austin. He is an applied game theorist and studies … Continue reading “Lowery “outplayed” by UT-Austin administrators”

Want more?

Sign up to receive all of our articles and news in our weekly newsletters.
Subscribe

© 2023 The James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal — Privacy Policy

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS